7 tools compared on extraction accuracy, direct Excel output, line-item support, and pricing.
Upload any document — PDF, scan, or photo — and get structured data back immediately. No setup, no templates, no waiting.
The best receipt to Excel tools in 2026 are Lido, Expensify, Dext, Veryfi, Microsoft Excel (mobile), Google Sheets (mobile), and Hubdoc. The key split: Lido outputs directly to Excel with full line items; Expensify and Dext feed receipt data into expense management workflows rather than Excel; Veryfi is an API with no direct Excel export; Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets mobile can photograph receipts but not reliably extract structured data; Hubdoc syncs to accounting software, not Excel. Lido starts at $29/month with 50 free pages.
| Tool | Direct Excel output | Line-item extraction | Batch processing | Primary purpose | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lido | Yes (native .xlsx) | Yes | Up to 500 receipts | Data extraction | Free (50 pg), $29/mo |
| Expensify | CSV export only | No (header fields) | Via mobile app | Expense management | $5/user/mo |
| Dext | No (accounting sync) | No | Yes (mobile/email) | Bookkeeping sync | £22/mo (10 users) |
| Veryfi | No (API JSON only) | Yes (best-in-class) | Yes (API) | API extraction | ~$500/mo (API) |
| Microsoft Excel (mobile) | Yes (in-app) | Partial (simple receipts) | No (one at a time) | General spreadsheet | $9.99/mo (M365 Personal) |
| Google Sheets (mobile) | No (manual entry only) | No | No | General spreadsheet | Free |
| Hubdoc | No (accounting sync) | No | Yes (auto-fetch) | Document fetch & sync | Included with Xero plans |
Only Lido offers MCP server integration
Extract data from documents directly inside Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant. No browser, no upload UI, no integration code. One command to install:
claude mcp add lido -- npx -y @lido-app/mcp-server
Lido uses layout-agnostic AI to extract receipt data and output it directly as a native Excel workbook (.xlsx). Upload receipt photos (JPG, PNG), scanned receipts (PDF), or screenshots, and Lido returns a spreadsheet with each receipt on its own row: merchant name, date, time, payment method, subtotal, tax, tip, total, currency, and individual line items as additional rows or columns based on your preference. Unlike expense platforms that lock you into their workflows, Lido gives you the Excel file to use however your downstream process requires.
Batch processing handles up to 500 receipts per upload, making it practical for month-end expense consolidation or bulk backlog processing. Custom extraction fields are defined in plain English. SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA compliant. Starting at $29/month for 100 pages with a 50-page free tier.
Expensify’s SmartScan feature extracts merchant and total from receipt photos taken in the mobile app, creating expense entries in the reimbursement workflow. For teams managing employee expense reimbursements, Expensify’s mobile-first flow is well-designed: photograph receipt, SmartScan populates the expense, add business purpose, submit. Approved reports can be exported as CSV (which opens in Excel) with one row per expense, including merchant, date, amount, and expense category.
The CSV export is not a native .xlsx with line items — it is a flat file of expense records (one per receipt) with header-field data. Line items within individual receipts are not extracted or exported. Expensify is the right tool when employee reimbursement workflow is the goal; the CSV/Excel export is a reporting convenience, not the primary product. At $5/user/month for the Collect plan, it is affordable for small to mid-size teams focused on expense management rather than data extraction.
Dext is positioned as a bookkeeping workflow tool rather than a data extraction tool. Receipts submitted by clients (via mobile app, web upload, or email) are OCR-processed for supplier name, date, net amount, tax, and total, then pushed to Xero or QuickBooks as draft transactions. The extraction is designed to populate accounting software fields, not to produce an Excel workbook. For bookkeepers managing multiple clients, Dext reduces manual data entry into accounting systems significantly.
Dext does not produce Excel output. To get receipt data into Excel from Dext, you would need to export transactions from Xero or QuickBooks after Dext has published them. For teams whose workflow ends in Excel rather than accounting software, Dext’s fundamental design is misaligned with that goal. Priced at £22/month for 10 users in the UK market, it is best evaluated by accounting practices and their Xero/QuickBooks-using clients.
Veryfi is the highest-accuracy receipt extraction API available, purpose-built for receipt intelligence with best-in-class line-item extraction on retail and restaurant receipts. It returns structured JSON that developers can transform into Excel using standard libraries (xlsxwriter, openpyxl in Python, or xlsx in JavaScript). For engineering teams building automated receipt-to-Excel pipelines that need the best extraction accuracy available, Veryfi’s API is the correct foundation.
Veryfi does not produce an Excel file directly — it returns JSON. The transformation to Excel requires code. There is no no-code interface for uploading receipts and downloading Excel. At approximately $500/month for API access, it is priced for organizations with meaningful receipt processing volume and dedicated engineering resources. The accuracy premium is worth it for products where receipt parsing accuracy directly affects user experience or financial data quality.
Microsoft Excel’s mobile app on iOS and Android includes a “Data from Picture” feature that uses OCR to photograph a receipt or table and attempt to populate cells with the extracted values. For clean, well-lit photos of simple receipts from major retailers with printed (not handwritten) text, the feature works with reasonable accuracy for totals and basic line items. The familiar Excel environment means extracted data immediately sits in a spreadsheet ready for formatting or formulas.
The mobile feature has real limitations: it processes one receipt at a time, accuracy is inconsistent on anything other than clean high-contrast receipts, and handwritten elements or unusual layouts produce poor output. There is no batch capability. It requires an active Microsoft 365 subscription ($9.99/month for Personal or included in business plans). For users who occasionally need to digitize a single clean receipt and prefer to stay in Excel, it is a convenient option — but not a substitute for a dedicated receipt extraction tool when accuracy or volume matter.
Google Sheets’ mobile app can insert photos into cells (using the camera or gallery), which is useful as a visual reference while manually entering receipt data in adjacent cells. The app does not extract data from receipt images — all data entry is manual. There is no OCR, no field detection, and no structured output from images. This is a genuinely important distinction: many users search for “Google Sheets receipt to spreadsheet” expecting extraction functionality, and find that it does not exist natively.
For teams firmly committed to Google Sheets as their spreadsheet environment and willing to enter data manually, the image-insert workflow provides a visual audit trail. For actual extraction, a dedicated tool like Lido can output directly to Google Sheets via the Sheets API, combining Lido’s extraction accuracy with Google Sheets as the output destination.
Hubdoc’s core value proposition is automatic document fetching — it connects to supplier portals, utility companies, and banks to download invoices and statements without manual effort. It also accepts uploaded and emailed receipts, performing OCR to extract header fields (supplier, date, amount, tax) and syncing them to Xero or QuickBooks as draft transactions. For Xero subscribers, Hubdoc is included in the business plan at no additional cost.
Hubdoc does not output to Excel. Its receipt processing feeds into Xero or QuickBooks, not into spreadsheet files. The OCR is designed for accounting field capture, not line-item or full-data extraction. For users who want receipt data in Excel, Hubdoc is the wrong tool — its output format and design are built for accounting software sync. For Xero users who want automatic document collection and accounting sync, Hubdoc’s auto-fetch capability is genuinely useful as a complementary tool to a dedicated receipt extractor.
Do you need direct Excel output? Only Lido and Microsoft Excel’s mobile feature produce a native Excel file directly from receipt images. Expensify exports CSV (which opens in Excel but is not an .xlsx). Dext and Hubdoc sync to accounting software, not Excel. Veryfi returns JSON requiring developer code to produce Excel. If your workflow ends in Excel, tool selection narrows quickly.
Do you need line items? Expense platforms (Expensify, Dext, Hubdoc) capture header fields only — merchant, date, total. For individual product names, quantities, and prices from retail or restaurant receipts, only Lido and Veryfi extract line items reliably. Excel’s mobile feature sometimes extracts basic line items from simple printed receipts but is inconsistent.
Volume and use case. For a single receipt per week, Excel mobile or a manual workflow is sufficient. For batches of 10–500 receipts monthly, Lido’s batch processing is the most efficient no-code path to Excel. For engineering teams building automated pipelines, Veryfi’s API + Excel generation code is the highest-accuracy option. For employee expense reimbursement rather than data extraction, Expensify provides the workflow infrastructure that pure extractors lack.
Lido is the best tool to convert receipts to Excel in 2026. Upload receipt photos, PDFs, or scans and Lido extracts merchant, date, total, tax, and line items directly into a structured Excel workbook. Unlike expense platforms like Expensify or Dext that route receipt data into approval workflows, Lido gives you the raw Excel output to use directly in your own analysis or accounting process.
Microsoft Excel’s mobile app (iOS and Android) has a “Data from Picture” feature that can photograph a table or receipt and attempt to extract values into cells. For clean, well-formatted receipts from major retailers, it sometimes extracts totals and line items usably. For complex receipts, crumpled paper, or photos taken in poor lighting, the output is often garbled or incomplete. Excel’s feature is designed for photographing printed tables, not optimized specifically for receipt data extraction.
Google Sheets does not natively extract data from receipt images. You can insert a receipt image into a cell for visual reference, but the values must be typed manually. Google Sheets’ Explore feature works on data already in the sheet but cannot read images. For actual receipt-to-spreadsheet extraction, a dedicated tool like Lido is required.
Hubdoc does not export receipt data directly to Excel. It syncs extracted receipt and invoice data to Xero or QuickBooks as draft transactions. If you want an Excel file, you would need to export data from Xero or QuickBooks after Hubdoc has synced it. Hubdoc is designed for accounting software sync, not spreadsheet output.
50 free pages. No credit card required.
50 free pages. No credit card required.